CliniFusion vs MediYeti
Compare features, pricing, and ketamine-specific capabilities
Ketamine Features
6
out of 7
CliniFusion
Ketamine Features
6
out of 7
MediYeti
Pricing
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Ketamine Features
6 / 7
6 / 7
IV Protocols
IM Protocols
Outcome Tracking
SPRAVATO® Workflows
Rating Scales
Consent Forms
Series Tracking
Ideal For
IV ketamine infusion clinics run by anesthesiologists seeking specialized infusion charting and vital signs integration.
Ketamine and mental health practices prioritizing billing automation and wanting US-based, same-timezone support.
Pros
- Founded by board-certified anesthesiologists who understand ketamine dosing
- First-to-market EMR specifically for ketamine clinics (2017)
- Automatic vital signs transfer from monitoring equipment
- Strong billing and claims management features
- Modular system - customize to your practice needs
- Utah-based support team in same time zone
Cons
- Pricing not publicly available - requires contact
- Less focus on mental health features vs. infusion clinic operations
- Primarily deployed in Southwest US - may have limited support elsewhere
- No mobile app available
- English only - no multilingual support
- No API for custom integrations
Summary
Choose CliniFusion if you...
- Founded by board-certified anesthesiologists who understand ketamine dosing
- First-to-market EMR specifically for ketamine clinics (2017)
- Automatic vital signs transfer from monitoring equipment
Choose MediYeti if you...
- Strong billing and claims management features
- Modular system - customize to your practice needs
- Utah-based support team in same time zone
Compare Other Software
Not finding what you need? Browse more comparison options.
View All Comparisons